File #: AR-19-505    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Agenda Reports Status: Passed
File created: 11/29/2019 In control: Community Growth & Infrastructure Standing Committee
On agenda: 1/13/2020 Final action: 1/13/2020
Title: Community Engagement Survey Results Presented by: Darija Slokar, Senior Advisor & Project Manager, Strategic Services & Information Technology Department
Attachments: 1. City of St. Albert 2019 Community Engagement Survey - General Population, 2. City of St. Albert 2019 Community Engagement Survey Public Mail-to-Web

TAMRMS#:   B09

 

title

Community Engagement Survey Results

Presented by: Darija Slokar, Senior Advisor & Project Manager, Strategic Services & Information Technology Department

 

label

RECOMMENDATION:

recommendation

 

That Community Growth & Infrastructure Standing Committee recommend to Council that the 2019 Community Engagement Survey results, contained in the attachments to the January 13, 2019 agenda report entitled “Community Engagement Survey Results”, be received as information. 

 

body

PURPOSE OF REPORT

 

The purpose of the report is to provide to Council results of the 2019 Community Engagement Survey. 

 

ALIGNMENT TO COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITY

 

N/A


ALIGNMENT TO SERVICE DELIVERY

 

The report is related to the Public Participation program.  Specifically, the statistically representative Community Engagement Survey conducted every two years to provide opportunity for residents to share their opinions and perceptions on the City’s programs and services to inform decision-making. 


ALIGNMENT TO COUNCIL (OR COMMITTEE) DIRECTION OR MANDATORY STATUTORY PROVISION

 

City Council Policy C-CAO-20 Public Participation Policy was approved at the March 20, 2019 Council meeting.

 

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION

The City conducts a Community Engagement Survey biennially to gauge community opinions and perceptions about quality of life, safety, overall satisfaction with City services, facilities and service expectations.  It is one of many important tools used to help gauge resident’s satisfaction with services and quality of life in St. Albert, identify community priorities and opportunities to optimize services delivered to the community.

 

Yardstick Research (formerly Banister Research and Consulting) was selected to conduct the 2019 Community Engagement Survey with the following objectives:

 

                     Measure residents’ perception regarding quality of life and safety

                     Measure residents’ perception to expectations related to programs, services and customer experience

                     Measure residents’ perception to expectations related to municipal government

 

The survey took place from November 14 to December 11, 2019.  Three approaches were used to maximize the reach into the community:

1.                     General population - 453 surveys completed

Surveyed via telephone and a web survey that was distributed through targeted social media advertisements. Age and gender quotas were established to ensure proper demographic representation of the City of St. Albert.  General Population survey results alone give a margin of error no greater than ±4.6% at the 95% confidence level (or 19 times out of 20). 

 

2.                     Stakeholder Web-based Survey (Mail-to-Web) - 603 surveys completed

Letters were mailed to 5,000 randomly selected households in St. Albert with a link and a unique PIN number to access the survey online. 

 

3.                     Open Web-Based Survey - 283 surveys completed

An open web link to provide all residents and members of community an opportunity to participate in the survey.  The link was advertised using social media, local paper and the City’s website.

 

Tracy with Yardstick Research will be in attendance to share the St. Albert results.

 

Highlights of Findings

 

                     The overall quality of life remains exceptionally high.

                     The City of St. Albert continues to be considered a very safe place to live.

                     The number of respondents who said that their expectations of the services provided by the City were met, decreased for the majority of services.  Exceptions are Fire and Ambulance Services, Policing Services, Preserving Community Heritage, which remained at a comparable level to previous survey. 

                     The perception on housing options and services (new to 2019 survey), for those in need, reveals that there is a need for more affordable housing options, for an increased number of rental options and for more services and programs that serve those in need. 

 

For Future Consideration

Although the 2019 survey was shorter than in previous years, the length of the survey still presented the challenge for the response rate. Administration will review the questions asked and look for opportunities to streamline the questionnaire. More focus on only the key questions with the greatest value will help reduce the length and improve the effectiveness of the survey.

Additionally, Administration will continue to explore an online option for engaging with residents on an ongoing basis.

Following the presentation to Council, Administration will further analyze the results to determine where there are opportunities to improve service delivery. Administration will also share the survey results with residents and community as a whole through City’s website, Citylights and social media channels. 

 

STAKEHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS OR ENGAGEMENT

The purpose of the survey was to engage stakeholders and obtain their opinions and perceptions for City’s programs and services.  

 

IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION(S)

Financial:

The expenses related to the survey were included in the 2019 budget. 

Legal / Risk:

All responses to the survey are anonymous. 

Program or Service

Results of the survey are reviewed by Administration and potential opportunities to optimize services and service delivery are noted and addressed as appropriate.  The results are also considered for the City’s business planning and budgeting. 

Organizational:

N/A

 

ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED

None

 

body

Report Date: January 13, 2020

Author(s): Darija Slokar

Committee/Department:  Strategic Services & Information Technology Department

Deputy Chief Administrative Officer: Kerry Hilts

Chief Administrative Officer:  Kevin Scoble