File #: BL-19-026    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Bylaw Status: Passed
File created: 7/2/2019 In control: City Council
On agenda: 8/19/2019 Final action: 8/19/2019
Title: Bylaw 24/2019 Municipal Public Utilities Bylaw (2nd & 3rd Reading) Presented by: David Leflar, Director, Legal & Legislative Services
Attachments: 1. Bylaw 24/2019 Municipal Public Utilities
TAMRMS#: B06

title
Bylaw 24/2019 Municipal Public Utilities Bylaw (2nd & 3rd Reading)
Presented by: David Leflar, Director, Legal & Legislative Services

label
RECOMMENDATION:
recommendation

1. That Bylaw 24/2019 be read a second time.

2. That Bylaw 24/2019 be read a third time.

body
PURPOSE OF REPORT
The purpose of this report is to transmit to Council the recommendation of the Governance, Priorities and Finance Committee (GPFC) at its August 12, 2019 meeting that Bylaw 24/2019, the Municipal Public Utilities Bylaw, be passed.


ALIGNMENT TO COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITY
N/A


BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The Municipal Government Act has for many years contained a section that allows a council to pass a bylaw prohibiting any person from providing the same or similar utility services as those provided by the municipality or by a subsidiary corporation of the municipality. Historically, municipalities whose utility services consisted only of traditional potable water supply, wastewater collection/treatment, stormwater management and garbage disposal, have not often taken advantage of this statutory power (1). This is because the financial and regulatory barriers to entry, and the “natural monopoly” nature of such utilities services, make it unlikely that a private sector corporation would emerge to challenge the exclusivity of municipalities in this economic space.

_________________________
(1). Such bylaw provisions have however been enacted in other Alberta municipalities, although they are more often embedded within bylaws governing specific types of utility services (for example s. 5 of Edmonton’s EPCOR Water and Wastewater Bylaw or s. 32 of Medicine Hat’s Electric Utility Bylaw) as opposed to a stand-alone bylaw like proposed Bylaw 24/2009 that covers all possible utilities services, present and future. Wood Buffalo is an example of an Alberta municipality that has enacted a similar stand-alone bylaw to provide general protection for its monopoly p...

Click here for full text