TAMRMS#: B06
title
PH Bylaw 1/2021, Bylaw 2/2021, and Bylaw 3/2021 Range Road 260: MDP, Renaming and ASP Amendments (2nd & 3rd Readings)
Presented by: Sajid Sifat, Planner, Planning and Development - MDP & ASP Amendment and Tracy Tsui, Planner, Planning and Development - Renaming
label
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS
recommendation
That the Public Hearing on Bylaw 1/2021, Bylaw 2/2021, and Bylaw 3/2021 be closed.
(1) Municipal Development Plan Amendment
1. That Bylaw 1/2021, being amendment 21 to the Municipal Development Plan 15/2007, be read a second time.
2. That Bylaw 1/2021, being amendment 21 to the Municipal Development Plan 15/2007, be read a third time.
(2) Area Structure Plan Amendment rename Range Road 260
1. That Bylaw 2/2021, being amendment 2 to rename the Range Road 260 Area Structure Plan 23/2014, be read a second time.
2. That Bylaw 2/2021, being amendment 2 to rename the Range Road 260 Area Structure Plan 23/2014, be read a third time.
(3) Range Road 260 Area Structure Plan
1. That Bylaw 3/2021, being amendment 3 to the Range Road 260 Area Structure Plan 23/2014, be read a second time.
2. That Bylaw 3/2021, being amendment 3 to the Range Road 260 Area Structure Plan 23/2014, be read a third time.
body
PURPOSE OF REPORT
This report presents proposed amendments to the Municipal Development Plan (MDP) - City Plan Bylaw 15/2007, and the Range Road 260 Area Structure Plan (ASP) Bylaw 23/2014. These amendments require a public hearing and Council’s approval, as per the requirements in the Municipal Government Act (MGA).
ALIGNMENT TO COUNCIL DIRECTION OR MANDATORY STATUTORY PROVISION
On March 1, 2021, Council passed the following motions:
1. That Bylaw 1/2021, being amendment 21 to the Municipal Development Plan 15/2007, be read a first time.
2. That Bylaw 2/2021, being amendment 2 to rename the Range Road 260 Area Structure Plan 23/2014, be read a first time.
3. That Bylaw 3/2021, being amendment 3 to the Range Road 260 Area Structure Plan 23/2014, be read a first time.
4. That the Public Hearing be scheduled for April 6, 2021.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Please refer to the attachment entitled Previously Distributed, which includes the 1st reading report from March 1, 2021.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED
Bylaw 1/2021 - MDP Amendment
If Council does not wish to support the recommendation, the following alternative could be considered:
Defeat second and third reading of Bylaw 1/2021, which will have the following implications:
• The existing Land Use Designations in MDP-CityPlan will remain.
Bylaw 2/2021 - Range Road 260 ASP Amendment to Rename
If Council does not wish to support Bylaw 2/2021 to rename the Range Road 260 ASP to the Cherot ASP, the following alternative could be considered:
Defeat second and third reading of Bylaw 2/2021, which will have the following implications:
• The existing name, Range Road 260, will remain, and Administration will revise Schedule A by removing Cherot and replacing with Range Road 260.
• Provide additional direction to Administration on naming.
Bylaw 3/2021 - Range Road 260 ASP Amendments
If Council does not wish to support the recommendation, the following alternatives could be considered:
1. Defeat second and third reading of Bylaw 3/2021, which will have the following implications:
The existing Land Use Designations in the Cherot (Range Road 260) Area Structure Plan will remain.
2. If Council wishes to support the partial closure of Range Road 260, direct Administration to make text and map changes to support the partial closure of Range Road 260.
body
Report Date: April 6, 2021
Authors: Sajid Sifat & TracyTsui
Department: Planning & Development
Deputy Chief Administrative Officer: Kerry Hilts
Chief Administrative Officer: Kevin Scoble